Stubborn, foul-mouthed and anger

 

                              Stubborn, foul-mouthed and anger

It was 2019 that a motor car, the young man got down and asked, "Who is Zulfiqar?" shouted, Zulfikar got up and straightened up, the young man angrily said, "Then you take twenty paise." As well as pistoling and starting the program, the bullet hits Zulfikar's heart, drives away from young Apple on a motorbike and escapes. You then rushed Zulfikar to work and to the hospital, but he did not reach you.
Who was this Zulfiqar? He was an ordinary poor citizen. It used to puncture tires on the closed road in Lahore. There was a shop at the petrol pump. Three brothers worked in the same shop.
On March 29, 2019, at seven o'clock in the morning, a young man came to puncture the motorcycle. Zulfiqar demanded seventy rupees as labor. The young man said, "Puncture people take fifty rupees, why are you taking twenty rupees extra?" Zulfikar replied, "We only take seventy." "I give fifty and I will give you fifty too," replied the motorcyclist.
There was an argument between the two and the dispute over twenty rupees turned into a fight. The motorcyclist threatened Zulfikar and left. Six days later on April 4 in the evening another youth came, asked for Zulfikar and shot him and escaped.
Walfaqar was only 22 years old. He has two sisters and two brothers. He got married a year ago, and was the father of a two-month-old son. The whole family lived in a rented house and the puncture shop was the only "source of income" of the family but the whole family was ruined because of Rs.20. Zulfiqar passed away, the other two brothers are repeatedly going round the police stations and even if the criminal is arrested, these two brothers will leave the work of puncture and go round the court and courtrooms.
The question arises, who is responsible for all this destruction? Is 20 rupees responsible for this? no Please! Only twenty rupees is not responsible for it. How! Let us consider this.
We always side with the victim in such stories. We also consider the victim as oppressed. But a session judge friend of mine has a completely different opinion. They always blame the victims for their murders. "I always felt more cruel in murder cases than the dead murderer," he says. This was surprising to me, but the judge said, "Murderers are certainly cruel. They suffer the punishment of their cruelty later, but in fact the victim dies before the murderer. May God punish the victim before the murderer." Gives. Why? We ever thought!"
"I have sentenced hundreds of people to death in my career," the judge said. is more cruel than. It is so cruel that the murderer has no option but to kill him. I found a phrase behind most of the cases, if you are your father's, shoot me and the murderer himself. He was forced to shoot to prove his fatherhood."
The judge said, "My analysis is that nature first punishes the victim for being obstinate, abusive and violent and then kills the murderer." He said, "If the victim has the substance of tolerance and decency and if the matter is understood, then it should never be a murder.
I did not agree with him, but when I read the news of Zulfikar's murder over 20 rupees in the newspaper, for the first time I felt the weight of the judge's words. I was forced to think that maybe it was not so difficult to kill for twenty rupees, as it is to kill a human being and the murderer did it six days later. If he had killed Zulfikar during the quarrel, it would have been understandable, but he waited for six days, why?
I felt, the killer must have been in pain for six days. His anger may have been increasing rather than decreasing. Even he or one of his brothers went out alone with a pistol and killed Zulfikar in his shop. I realized that Zulfiqar's killer was not an unknown person, Zulfiqar's killer was Zulfiqar himself. Nature punished him for thinking why he had brought the issue of twenty rupees to a level where the other person would not be normal, he would boil with anger and he would boil for six days. So Zulfiqar's killer was not twenty rupees, it was Zulfiqar himself.
Now look at this incident a little differently. Suppose the killer came for a puncture, he did the puncture, Zulfiqar asked him for seventy rupees, the killer told him, I always get a puncture for fifty rupees, Zulfiqar politely replied, my brother uses good material. , the rent of the shop is also high and I keep the shop open all night, so my rate is high. The killer replies with a stern tone, No! I will give only fifty rupees. Zulfiqar politely replies, "Sir! We take seventy rupees, but if you want to give fifty, you can give it, or if you don't have twenty rupees, you will be given again sometime, or else sir!" As you wish."
What would the murderer say in response to Zulfiqar? He would certainly have given fifty rupees and left Zulfikar's life and his family would have been saved from destruction. But I am sure that Zulfiqar would have insisted on twenty rupees and so this matter of twenty rupees will be very soon "If you belong to your father, show me with your hand!" would have reached and twenty rupees would have taken two families and sat down. Zulfiqar's family was destroyed And the murderer's family will be humiliated and disgraced after his arrest. It will also prosecute by begging
We can look at this incident from another angle. We assume the killer came for a puncture, he always paid fifty rupees for a puncture, Zulfiqar's shop rate was also fifty rupees but Zulfiqar took advantage of his compulsion. He reached the puncture shop at seven in the morning, got the puncture and Zulfiqar demanded twenty rupees more. It was blackmail and thirty percent of us would die but not be blackmailed. The killer was among those 30 percent.
He persisted and the matter reached "no return". But the murderer then calculated the quarrel, looked at twenty rupees in twenty rupees and thought that for twenty rupees I will spoil my whole day, quarrel with this ignorant man, quarrel with him, spoil my clothes. will So he took out seventy rupees, gave it to Zulfiqar and left thinking that.
This person is a blackmailer and a cheater, I will not come to his shop again and thus avoid being a murderer, being a murderer and being killed by Zulfiqar. But in this case both these options failed. Both Zulfiqar and the murderer were adamant on twenty rupees.
I think this issue was not about twenty rupees, it was an issue of intolerance, indecency and miscalculation and we as a nation are suffering from these three vices. We have no tolerance at all, we get angry at trivial things and provoke others, we are also rude and rude people, our tongues are bitter and our words are harsh, and you should remember that a person can tolerate a word. But the tone and style rips him apart from the inside. Twenty rupees is not an issue
But the way the other person asks for twenty rupees, the tone in which he asks for twenty rupees breaks a person. . We even forgive people but we never forget their style and tone. If we only fix our tone, our style, we stick to our position, but we do not leave the foot of politeness and civility, then our disagreement should never turn into a quarrel or conflict.
Language is the deadliest weapon in the
person a murderer and victim at any time and language destroys families but
none of us are trained to use a deadly weapon like language. We've left it open
so the language continues to set the world on fire and our last addiction is
calculation.


 
None of us calculates our day, our mood, our health and our life, is our life worth just 20 rupees? Should we ruin our health, our mood and our day just for twenty rupees? How many of us do this calculation, maybe not even one percent.
Someday you sit in a lonely room and determine your own worth. I am sure you will never fight with a person for twenty rupees again, you will sacrifice money but save your day, mood, health and life, you will never be Zulfiqar in life and not an unknown killer. You will value yourself or else some motorcyclist will come and take your health or life away and people will be wringing their hands in pity saying, "You poor thing was killed for only twenty rupees".

world. This weapon can set the whole world on fire, it can make any normal